Ride-hail use varies both by land use and demographics. In general, people are more likely to use ride hail services in dense, urban areas [1], [2]. Ride-hail users in the United States tend to own fewer cars, and are more likely to use public transit, than the average resident [2]. There are exceptions, notably Los Angeles, where ride hailing is popular in both urban and lower-density neighborhoods [3]. A separate study from California found that people in lower density suburban and rural areas who used ride hail services tended to earn higher incomes; in contrast, urban ride hail users tended to earn lower-incomes [4].

Given that ride-hail trips are more frequent in urban areas, it is unsurprising that places with high rates of ride-hail use also tend to have high rates of street parking occupancy [5]. Ride-hail has the potential to alleviate curb congestion if a sufficient threshold of car trips are replaced. Ride-hail users may select the service specifically to avoid cruising for parking where few curb spots are available, and thus free up a longer-term parking spot [5]. However, those freed up spots may quickly be taken up by drivers who would otherwise have parked elsewhere, parked at a different time, or not made the trip by private vehicle at all. Moreover, ride-hail drivers must compete for curb access when dropping off riders, and thus temporarily congest the curb. Additional research is needed to better understand the impacts of ride-hail on land use and curb congestion.

References

  1. F. Alemi, G. Circella, P. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy, “What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 102, pp. 233–248, 2019.

  2. R. Grahn, C. D. Harper, C. Hendrickson, Z. Qian, and H. S. Matthews, “Socioeconomic and usage characteristics of transportation network company (TNC) riders,” Transportation, vol. 47, pp. 3047–3067, 2020.

  3. A. Brown, “Redefining car access: Ride-hail travel and use in Los Angeles,” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 83–95, 2019.

  4. M. Shirgaokar, A. Misra, A. W. Agrawal, M. Wachs, and B. Dobbs, “Differences in ride-hailing adoption by older Californians among types of locations,” J. Transp. Land Use, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 367–387, 2021.

  5. B. Y. Clark and A. Brown, “What does ride-hailing mean for parking? Associations between on-street parking occupancy and ride-hail trips in Seattle,” Case Stud. Transp. Policy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 775–783, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.014.

Related Literature Reviews

See Literature Reviews on Ridehail/Transportation Network Companies

See Literature Reviews on Land Use

Note: Mobility COE research partners conducted this literature review in Spring of 2024 based on research available at the time. Unless otherwise noted, this content has not been updated to reflect newer research.